Lenovo Yoga 720 2-in-1 133 Touchscreen Laptop Review
Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB (7200U, FHD) Laptop Review
Swish and versatile! Lenovo crams energy-efficient components into their new 13-inch convertible while at the same time managing not to skimp on bombardment capacity. Find out what else the Yoga 720 has to offer in our extensive review.
For the original High german review, see here.
thirteen-inch devices accept become increasingly popular in the concluding few years. Not only do they offer decent performance, they are also insufficiently lightweight and incredibly versatile when designed equally 2-in-one convertibles. Based on Intel's Kaby Lake architecture, Lenovo's latest gadget is a xiii-inch convertible named Yoga 720-13IKB. Our review unit was equipped with anIntel Core i5-7200U processor, 8 GB of DDR4 RAM, and a 256 GB PCIe SSD. Featuring an FHD touchscreen and including an agile stylus pen, the device is available for around $850.
Optional upgrades include a faster Cadre i7-7500U, upward to 16 GB of RAM, and SSDs with up to 1 TB of storage chapters. Due to the lack of a 2.v-inch storage bay the Yoga just supports Grand.two SSDs. While an optional 4k panel is listed on Lenovo's website, it may non be available everywhere. Consequently, every bit nosotros speak the 4k option is not even mentioned on Lenovo'southward US website yet.
For this comparison we've called convertibles which are priced similarly to the Yoga 720-13IKB. A quick summary with all relevant information can be institute in the following table.
| Asus Zenbook Flip | Dell Inspiron thirteen | Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro xiii | Acer Spin five | |
| CPU | Intel Core i5-7200U | Intel Core i7-6500U | Intel Core Chiliad-5Y70 | Intel Cadre i3-6100U |
| GPU | Intel HD Graphics 620 | Intel Hard disk Graphics 520 | Intel HD Graphics 5300 | Intel HD Graphics 520 |
| Panel | thirteen.3 inch 1920 x 1080 | 13.3 inch 1920 x 1080 | 13.three inch 3200 x 1800 | 13.3 inch 1920 x 1080 |
| RAM | 8 GB DDR3-1866 | 8 GB DDR3L-1600 | 8 GB DDR3-1600 | four GB DDR4-2133 |
| SSD | 256 GB | 256 GB | 512 GB | 128 GB |
Memory
8192 MB
, DDR4-2133, Dual-Channel
Display
13.thirty inch 16:9, 1920 10 1080 pixel 166 PPI, 10-bespeak multitouch, native pen support, LP133WF4-SPB1, IPS, glossy: yeah
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Weight
1.286 kg ( = 45.36 oz / 2.84 pounds), Power Supply: 292 g ( = 10.iii oz / 0.64 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with like specifications.
The reminiscence to theYoga 710-14ISK is striking. The case is fabricated mostly of aluminum, which makes for a very pleasant and classy touch and experience. Our review unit was clad in "Platinum Silver;" the other two bachelor colors are "Fe Gray" and "Chopper". All-in-all the example feels very premium, is not very susceptible to fingerprints, and information technology can be easily wiped clean with a damp cloth. Nosotros did not notice any uneven or unusually large gaps. The lid features a discreet yet fashionable "YOGA" label. With its rounded corners and edges and its chamfered base of operations and display lid the 720-13IKB almost seems encircled in chrome.
We accept absolutely no complaints in regards to rigidity. The base is very sturdy and strong and near impossible to warp and twist, and applying pressure level to it doesn't seem to bear upon it either aside from marginal flex right in the middle of the keyboard. Similarly, thanks to Lenovo's choice of material, the hat is very robust and rigid. A slight ripple result can be observed when pressure is applied to the back of the display lid. The two 360-degree hinges are very strong and keep the panel firmly in place in every conceivable position. Due to the base'south low weight both hands are required to open the lid, and while the hinges are very firm they cannot prevent bouncing entirely.
Compared to its competitors, the Yoga 720-13IKB's footprint is significantly smaller, and at but 14.3 mm thickness (0.56 inches) it is far from chunky. Consequently, at only 1.iii kg (2.9 lbs) it is a true featherweight, especially when compared to the 1.7 kg (iii.viii lbs) heavyweight contestantsDell Inspiron 13 and Acer Spin 5.
❌
The Yoga 720-13IKB seems rather restrained in regard to ports. In addition to a regular USB 3.1 Type-A port capable of powering attached devices fifty-fifty with the device turned off, the Yoga merely features two USB Type-C ports with back up for Thunderbolt 3. Simply one of these two can exist used for charging the device("power commitment"). We would have loved to encounter an SD-card reader, and the lack thereof might put some users off.
Communication is handled by Intel's dual-band Wireless-AC 8265 module with a theoretical maximum transfer speed of 867 Mbit/s. We measured a very skilful 661 and 505 Mbit/southward sending and receiving information, respectively. The Yoga 720-13IKB is thus on a par with the Asus Zenbook Flip, which performed similarly well.
A docking station or an adapter is required for a network connection by cable. We tested a USB Type-C to RJ45 adapter, which was capable of transferring upward to one Gbit/s.
The Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB's security features include a fingerprint reader and a TPM ii.0 chip. McAfee LifeSafe is preinstalled on the device simply there is no fashion to physically lock the laptop to a desk-bound.
In addition to the laptop itself, the box contains a small 45-Watt charger, an agile stylus pen, a quick-kickoff guide, and the usual prophylactic and warranty data. At that place are no proprietary accessories for the Yoga 720-13IKB that we are aware of.
Despite the lack of a dedicated opening for maintenance, servicing the device is not a large bargain: the bottom plate can be removed quite easily. Actual servicing is rather limited past the fact that most components are soldered onto the motherboard, though. Only the SSD and the Wi-Fi module are user-replaceable, and the 2 fans tin can be hands removed for service and cleaning.
While our German review unit came with a 24-calendar month express warranty, Lenovo sells the device with a 12-month express warranty in the United States. Oddly, warranty upgrades for the Yoga 720 cannot exist purchased at the time of writing. Please meet ourGuarantees, Render policies and Warranties FAQ for land-specific information.
Notation: as of 5/10/2017, Lenovo'southward The states website lists various warranty upgrades of up to 3 years onsite ($179) for their May specials. These tin can be added to the device if purchased directly through lenovo.com.
The chiclet keyboard is embedded directly into the base of the device, which looks both appealing and uncluttered. The keys don't rattle or wobble, and with a spacing of 2 mm (0.08 inches) and a size of 17 ten 17 mm (0.67 ten 0.67 inches) they are comfortably large. All-in-all the keyboard seems pretty well designed and well thought-out. The white labels are easy to read, and the small F-keys don't seem excessively overloaded with their tiny symbols. The modest up and downwardly cursor keys volition have some getting used to, and they tend to lead to typos. Key stroke is very pronounced and perceptible, but it'southward slightly mushier than on other devices. Keyboard clatter is neither excessively loud nor expressionless silent, but it's certainly far from annoying. The unabridged keyboard flexes a piffling bit with pressure, and more so in the middle than on the sides. The white keyboard backlight is very discreet, tin be turned off completely, and it offers 2 different brightness levels.
The device's multi-touch ClickPad is embedded into the base surrounded by an unobtrusive chrome frame, and it matches the laptop's colour scheme. Its size of 10.5 x 7 cm (four.2 x i.8 inches) is impressive for a 13-inch laptop, and it has been designed to fill out the entire space available underneath the keyboard. Its centered position underneath the space bar ways it is shifted slightly to the left, which, still, wasn't disadvantageous in whatsoever way in everyday use during our tests. The lower role is symbolically divided into a left and right mouse button, and tactile and audible feedback are very noticeable without feeling inexpensive and shabby. The touchpad'south smooth surface is less susceptible to fingerprints than on other comparable devices.
Our review unit'due south FHD 1920x1080 touchscreen worked flawlessly during our tests. Input with both finger and active stylus was very fast and accurate up to its edges. The stylus was first-class for taking notes or letting one'southward creative juices menstruum, and overall the touchscreen was a pleasure to use.
Our review unit of measurement was equipped with a 13.3-inch IPS touchscreen display with a 1920x1080 FHD resolution. Lenovo also mentions an optional 4k UHD panel on the website, although it is currently not listed on Lenovo'south US website. The display's antireflective glass surface is very shine, which ways that working in vivid environments should exist possible thanks to an average brightness of 310 nits. At 350 nits, only the Asus Zenbook Flip offered an even brighter display.
Brightness distribution, on the other hand, was only 82% and therefore mediocre at best, and the contrast level of but 949:i cruel short of our expectations. Combined with insufficiently high black levels, color representation was a bit pale. Our review unit suffered from slight screen-bleeding most pronounced at the bottom of the screen. On the plus side, nosotros were unable to detect fifty-fifty the slightest trace of PWM-flickering, which ways that prolonged sessions in front of the screen should not result in whatever fatigue.
| 307 cd/m² | 288 cd/m² | 292 cd/m² | ||
| 314 cd/m² | 351 cd/m² | 316 cd/grand² | ||
| 290 cd/m² | 322 cd/m² | 306 cd/k² | ||
Distribution of brightness
LP133WF4-SPB1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 351 cd/thousand² (Nits) Average: 309.6 cd/m² Minimum: half dozen.vii cd/g²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 351 cd/m²
Dissimilarity: 949:1 (Blackness: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color v.03 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.iv
ΔE Greyscale three.62 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
84% sRGB (Argyll ane.6.iii 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll one.6.iii 3D)
61.two% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll two.2.0 3D)
83.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.iii% Display P3 (Argyll 2.two.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.eighteen
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB IPS, 1920x1080, thirteen.30 | Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T IPS, 1920x1080, thirteen.30 | Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 IPS, 1920x1080, 13.thirty | Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro xiii 80HE004LGE IPS, 3200x1800, thirteen.30 | Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 IPS LED, 1920x1080, thirteen.thirty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 5% | -33% | iv% | -33% | |
| Brandish P3 Coverage | 65.three | 64.1 -ii% | forty.31 -38% | 64.vi -i% | 39.99 -39% |
| sRGB Coverage | 83.7 | 91.8 x% | threescore.5 -28% | 89.five 7% | 59.five -29% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.2 | 65.two 7% | 41.65 -32% | 65.v seven% | 41.32 -32% |
| Response Times | -ix% | -16% | -11% | -40% | |
| Response Time Greyness fifty% / Grey eighty% * | 32 ? | 36 ? -13% | 38 ? -19% | 36 ? -thirteen% | 56 ? -75% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 27 ? -iv% | 29 ? -12% | 28 ? -8% | 27 ? -4% |
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 1330 ? | |||
| Screen | 6% | -31% | 4% | -1% | |
| Brightness middle | 351 | 368 5% | 253 -28% | 314 -xi% | 245 -30% |
| Brightness | 310 | 350 13% | 232 -25% | 294 -5% | 233 -25% |
| Brightness Distribution | 82 | 87 6% | 83 1% | 83 1% | 87 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.29 22% | 0.28 24% | 0.57 -54% | 0.21 43% |
| Dissimilarity | 949 | 1269 34% | 904 -5% | 551 -42% | 1167 23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | v.03 | 5.26 -five% | 6.36 -26% | 2.xviii 57% | 4.2 17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12 | 8.78 27% | 12.72 -6% | half dozen.48 46% | 8.75 27% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | iii.62 | 5.87 -62% | 10.26 -183% | ii.45 32% | 3.94 -9% |
| Gamma | two.18 101% | 2.42 91% | 2.28 96% | 2.39 92% | 2.66 83% |
| CCT | 6323 103% | 6998 93% | 6500 100% | 6745 96% | 6096 107% |
| Colour Space (Pct of AdobeRGB 1998) | 55 | 60 nine% | 38 -31% | 58 5% | 38 -31% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 84 | 92 10% | 60 -29% | 89 6% | 59 -thirty% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | i% / four% | -27% / -29% | -ane% / 2% | -25% / -13% |
* ... smaller is amend
Despite all that criticism the panel left a positive impression overall. While some clouding can be spotted with completely night backgrounds we didn't find anything during everyday utilize. DeltaE values of iii.6 (colors) and 5.0 (grayscale) were somewhat increased out of the box only we were able to improve both to levels of 3.3 and 0.7, respectively, through scale. Equally always, the ICC contour is available for download above.
sRGB colour-infinite coverage was 84%, AdobeRGB coverage was 55%. That said, the panel is not suitable for professional photo-editing.
Unfortunately, despite its antireflective coating, the Yoga 720-13IKB'due south display remains reflective to some extent. Lenovo's AntiGlare-coating works pretty well, though, and it reduces reflections significantly without being able to eliminate them entirely. In particular, bright environments both in- and outdoors are rather distracting. That said, the Yoga 720-13IKB is usable outdoors thanks to its decent brightness even in bright sunlight. We would advise yous to find a shady identify though.
Brandish Response Times
ℹ
Brandish response times prove how fast the screen is able to modify from one color to the next. Slow response times can pb to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
| ↔ Response Fourth dimension Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ xv ms rise | |
| ↘ eleven ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too irksome for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This ways that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and autumn ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise | |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows irksome response rates in our tests and volition exist unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is improve than the average of all tested devices (37.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will merely cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human being eye. If said frequency is too depression, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even detect the flickering altogether.
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
| In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 22039 (minimum: v - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | ||
Viewing angles are typical for an IPS console: identical from about every perspective. Only the corners are slightly tinted, which is also not uncommon for IPS panels. Since this is only noticeable at extreme angles information technology shouldn't impact everyday usage and usability.
Our review unit of measurement'due south performance can be summed up with one word: adequate. The device'southward CPU, Intel's Core i5-7200U, is well known at this point, and its 8 GB of RAM is plenty considering the Yoga 720-13IKB's designated usage scenarios. That said, sixteen GB models are available likewise, and given that the retentiveness is not user-upgradeable we propose you to pay special attention to this when purchasing the device.
Our review unit of measurement came equipped with a 256 GB SSD, which should suffice for nigh users but certainly won't exist enough for multimedia fans with large music, photo, or video collections. Fortunately, the M.2 SSD is user-replaceable and can thus exist upgraded. The data sheet lists SSDs with a capacity of up to 1 TB.
Intel'sCadre i5-7200U is a very capable yet also free energy-efficient processor with adequate functioning for everyday use. Its ii cores run at a base of operations frequency of ii.5 GHz, and the processor presents a total of four cores to the operating system thank you to Hyper-Threading. The Yoga 720-13IKB performed reasonably well in Cinebench R15'due south single-core test but dropped behind the Asus Zenbook Flip in multi-core tests.
In order to avoid thermal throttling, the CPU does non utilize its turbo heave at all, and the frequency remained at a steady 2.5 GHz throughout the entire Cinebench R15 multi-core benchmark. Even under load the device's xv W TDP was never reached or exceeded.
The processor reached its TDP limit later on the first run of our Cinebench R15 multi-cadre loop, and consequently there was no dip in performance leading to very consistent Cinebench R15 multi-core loop results. Thermal throttling did non occur during our tests, which ways it did not affect benchmark results.
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8083
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
9213
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4946
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
8130 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
11910 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Unmarried CPUs 64Bit
6434 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
ii.85 Points
Cinebench R11.five OpenGL 64Bit
34.51 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
i.46 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
268 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
128 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.vii %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
45.62 fps
Help
Even though the device's multi-cadre functioning fell short of our expectations, the Yoga 720-13IKB performed surprisingly well in our PCMark 8 benchmarks thanks to its fast SSD: it managed to all-time all of its competitors. Subjectively, performance was very adept, and the limitations we uncovered in the CPU benchmarks had no effect on everyday performance. The device boots in mere seconds and is set to use near instantly.
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB | |
| Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB | |
| Dell Inspiron thirteen 7359-4839 | |
| Acer Spin five SP513-51 | |
| Lenovo Yoga three Pro 13 80HE004LGE | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB | |
| Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 5471 points | |
| PCMark eight Habitation Score Accelerated v2 | 3744 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4494 points | |
| PCMark eight Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4717 points | |
| Assist | ||
Lenovo'south vendor of choice in regards to SSDs is Samsung, and our Yoga 720-13IKB was equipped with a 256 GB M.two Samsung PM961 SSD. In theory, Samsung specifies sequential read and write speeds of up to 2,800 and 1,100 MB/s, respectively. Running Every bit SSD to test our review unit's performance, nosotros measured a slightly lower than specified sequential read speed and a slightly higher than specified write speed of 2,352 MB/s and 1,180 MB/due south, respectively. Since none of the competitors was equipped with an NVMe SSD, the Yoga 720-13IKB performed much better than its entire contest. We would too like to emphasize the device's very good 4K read speed of almost lx MB/due south, which is particularly noticeable when loading a lot of small files.
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN) | Dell Inspiron xiii 7359-4839 Liteonit LCH-256V2S | Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro xiii 80HE004LGE Samsung SSD PM851 MZNTE512HMJH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -59% | -56% | -52% | |
| Read Seq | 2172 | 478.iv -78% | 486.3 -78% | 521 -76% |
| Write Seq | 1222 | 419.9 -66% | 283.seven -77% | 238.6 -eighty% |
| Read 512 | 1295 | 351.7 -73% | 337.five -74% | 417.3 -68% |
| Write 512 | 863 | 294.2 -66% | 283.five -67% | 237.7 -72% |
| Read 4k | 59.v | 24 -60% | 26.75 -55% | 35.9 -twoscore% |
| Write 4k | 150.3 | 87 -42% | 85.3 -43% | 99.9 -34% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 426.4 | 199.3 -53% | 309.7 -27% | 366.6 -xiv% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 360 | 232.4 -35% | 250.8 -thirty% | 236.7 -34% |
Sequential Read: 2172 MB/south
Sequential Write: 1222 MB/south
Sequential Read: 2352MB/s
Sequential Write: 1181MB/south
Access Fourth dimension Read: 0.044ms
Access Time Write: 0.028ms
Intel'southwardHard disk Graphics 620 is solely responsible for graphics output on the Lenovo 720-13IKB. Thanks to its dual-channel retentiveness configuration out of the box, graphics functioning is decent but don't look too much from this graphics fleck. While information technology did outperform itsIntel Hard disk Graphics 520-equipped competitors past upwards to 30%, the Yoga 720-13IKB was beaten past theAsus Zenbook Flip in 3DMark eleven.
Mostly speaking and for its intended utilise, graphics performance is more than than adequate. H.265/HVEC or Google VP9-encoded videos can be decoded in hardware and don't produce any noticeable CPU load whatever.
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB | |
| Acer Spin five SP513-51 | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro thirteen 80HE004LGE | |
| 1920x1080 Burn Strike Graphics | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB | |
| Acer Spin v SP513-51 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro xiii 80HE004LGE | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Functioning GPU | |
| Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 | |
| Acer Spin five SP513-51 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE | |
| 3DMark xi Performance | 1672 points | |
| 3DMark Water ice Storm Standard Score | 54379 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5768 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 858 points | |
| 3DMark Burn Strike Extreme Score | 391 points | |
| 3DMark Fourth dimension Spy Score | 364 points | |
| Assistance | ||
Since gaming is certainly not 1 of the Yoga'due south intended uses, games performed accordingly. TheIntel Hard disk drive Graphics 620's performance is barely skilful enough for playing older games such every bit BioShock Infinite or Battlefield 4 in HD on medium details. In FHD, performance collapsed to unplayable levels. Thus, anyone looking for a gaming machine is amend off looking for a laptop with a defended GPU instead.
When idle the Yoga 720-13IKB remains silent. Both fans are off and there are no electronic disturbances (aka whining) whatsoever. However, when browsing the web it doesn't have long for the fans to boot in. In boilerplate load, our review unit became very noticeable at a rather loud 37.7 dB(A) and was only drowned out by the Asus Zenbook Flip's 38.5 dB(A). It gets even louder nether heavy load, and we measured a maximum of 41.5 dB(A). This is definitely too loud, and the fans get really annoying later on a while. All of its competitors remained significantly quieter. For example, the Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 just reached 32 dB(A) nether load.
The only proficient thing we can say most the Yoga 720-13IKB's fans is that at least their noise is constant and non pulsating.
Noise Level
| Idle | 30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB(A) | |
| Load | 37.seven / 41.5 dB(A) | |
| ||
| 30 dB 40 dB(A) l dB(A) | ||
| min: | ||
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB Hard disk Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN) | Dell Inspiron thirteen 7359-4839 Hard disk Graphics 520, 6500U, Liteonit LCH-256V2S | Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro xiii 80HE004LGE HD Graphics 5300, 5Y70, Samsung SSD PM851 MZNTE512HMJH | Acer Spin five SP513-51 HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Hynix HFS128G39TND | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | ane% | i% | 4% | five% | |
| off / environs * | 30.5 | 30.7 -one% | 32.2 -6% | 31.ii -2% | 30.five -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.5 | 30.7 -i% | 32.two -half dozen% | 31.2 -2% | 30.5 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 30.5 | xxx.7 -ane% | 32.2 -6% | 31.4 -iii% | thirty.5 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.5 | 31.7 -4% | 32.ii -6% | 31.eight -four% | 30.half dozen -0% |
| Load Average * | 37.vii | 38.v -two% | 34.1 x% | 32.three xiv% | 31 18% |
| Load Maximum * | 41.v | 36 xiii% | 34 18% | 32 23% | 36.8 11% |
* ... smaller is better
Our review unit's case temperature remained at effectually 25 °C (77 °F) when idle, and thus considerably below 30 °C (86 °F). Under load temperatures reached a maximum of 43.6 °C (110.5 °F). The hot spot tin can exist found in the eye at the elevation right above the keyboard, which is exactly where the CPU is located and thus where most of the rut is emitted nether load. On average, all of the devices in this comparison remained at similar levels with the Yoga 720-13IKB staying libation here and there occasionally.
During our stress test, an extreme load scenario with Prime95 and Furmark running simultaneously for at least a total hr, the CPU reached a maximum of 77 °C (171 °F). Due to the fact that both CPU and GPU have to share the 15 West TDP, the CPU frequency was ultimately reduced to 2.three GHz. With only Prime95 running, theIntel Cadre i5-7200U CPU remained at a steady ii.v GHz and reached a temperature of 83 °C (182 °F). Nosotros did not notice any thermal throttling during our tests.
Immediately after performing the stress test, we benchmarked 3D functioning past running 3DMark 11 once over again. The college temperatures did non take whatever detrimental effect on 3D functioning whatsoever.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 41.five °C = 107 F Average: 35.i °C = 95 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 43.6 °C = 110 F Average: 35.6 °C = 96 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Supply (max.) 42.5 °C = 109 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | FIRT 550-Pocket
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 25.8 °C = 78 F Average: 24.viii °C = 77 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 27.two °C = 81 F Average: 25.6 °C = 78 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Supply (max.) 33.viii °C = 93 F | Room Temperature 21.2 °C = 70 F | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The boilerplate temperature for the upper side nether maximal load is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 30.ii °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.v °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21 to 55.vii °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The lesser heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.vi °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device boilerplate of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are libation than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.5 °C / 86.ix F and are therefore cool to the affect.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.4 °C / 83.1 F (-two.i °C / -3.8 F).
The two speakers Lenovo installed in the Yoga 720-13IKB are made by JBL and are located on both sides at the bottom up front end. Thus, in laptop way sound is noticeably muted and muffled if the device is placed on a soft surface. Make sure not to cover the speaker grills in order to avoid this. For a convertible, sound quality is okay overall. Due to a lack of volume, highs and mids are more pronounced than lows, merely we did detect a hint of bass. Yet even the Yoga'due south JBL speakers don't stand up a chance confronting external speakers or headphones, and either of those is thus mandatory for a first-course sound experience. At to the lowest degree the included audio software allows some equalizing and soundscape customization.
Due to the placement of the of the microphones at the bottom of the screen direct above the fan vents, the Yoga 720-13IKB disappoints in video chats by producing a constant disturbing static / hissing noise that is very noticeable at the receiving finish. This has to exist fixed immediately past Lenovo, for example by placing the microphones at the top of the screen.
Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on boilerplate 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.ane% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - merely iii.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall audio is boilerplate (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same course
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was twenty%, worst was 65%
Apple tree MacBook 12 (Early on 2016) ane.one GHz sound analysis
(+) | speakers tin can play relatively loud (83.vi dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average eleven.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is boilerplate (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs two - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only two% abroad from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.five% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (nine.iii% departure to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this form were meliorate, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» ii% of all tested devices were amend, one% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of iii%, average was 20%, worst was 65%
Frequency comparison (checkboxes above selectable/deselectable!)
A quick glance at the results made it very articulate to united states of america that Lenovo besides has to address power consumption as shortly as possible. Compared to its competition our review unit was not merely lagging behind, information technology was practically outclassed by its competitors. Idle ability consumption varied between 4.3 and 10 W, and under load it was at a record loftier of 34.2 Watts. While nonetheless relatively depression compared to laptops with dedicated GPUs, power consumption was on average 7% college than with the Asus Zenbook Flip.
The 45 West USB-C charger is powerful enough and capable of charging the battery fifty-fifty under load.
Please Notation:
Since the Yoga 720-13IKB is also available with an optional 4k panel, battery life specifications differ. Co-ordinate to Lenovo, devices equipped with the 4k panel should concluding an hour less than devices equipped with the FHD panel. Thus, the former volition most probable have even higher power consumption than our review unit.
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB i5-7200U, Hd Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.thirty | Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN), IPS, 1920x1080, thirteen.30 | Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 6500U, Hard disk Graphics 520, Liteonit LCH-256V2S, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE 5Y70, Hard disk Graphics 5300, Samsung SSD PM851 MZNTE512HMJH, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.30 | Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 6100U, Hard disk drive Graphics 520, Hynix HFS128G39TND, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.xxx | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ability Consumption | 7% | xviii% | 4% | 19% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.three | 4.two two% | iv 7% | four.8 -12% | 4.1 5% |
| Idle Average * | vii.ix | 7.iv 6% | 4.eight 39% | 10.7 -35% | half dozen.8 14% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10 | 8.half dozen xiv% | seven.6 24% | 11.eight -18% | vii.9 21% |
| Load Average * | 34.2 | 32 6% | xxx 12% | xviii.three 46% | 20.four 40% |
| Load Maximum * | 32.2 | 30.2 half-dozen% | 29.three ix% | 19.7 39% | 26.viii 17% |
* ... smaller is meliorate
Despite its comparatively high power consumption, the Yoga 720-13IKB generally offers decent battery life. The non-replaceable 48 Wh lithium-ion battery is the second-largest in our test grouping later on the Asus Zenbook Flip's 57 Wh battery. When idle, our review unit of measurement lasted an impressive 16 h 9 min before running out of juice. Under load information technology lasted for 2 h 27 min, which is even so very skilful.
Most relevant, however, is the real-life Wi-Fi examination simulating spider web-browsing by running a script and opening various websites every thirty seconds with the "Balanced" energy profile enabled and display effulgence prepare to 150 nits (which for our review unit meant lowering the brightness by 2 levels). With these settings, the Yoga 720-13IKB lasted a full 8 h 25 min and thus fifty-fifty bested the 8 hours specified by the manufacturer. The Yoga 720 volition concluding for 7 h 36 min when playing movies, which means y'all should exist able to watch two to three characteristic films back-to-back, and the battery is fully recharged after approximately two h 30 min. 3D performance was not measurably slower on bombardment than when plugged in.
Battery Runtime
| Idle (without WLAN, min brightness) | 16h 9min | |
| WiFi Websurfing (Border: 38.14393.1066.0) | 8h 25min | |
| Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p | 7h 36min | |
| Load (maximum brightness) | 2h 27min |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T i5-7200U, Hd Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro thirteen 80HE004LGE 5Y70, Hard disk Graphics 5300, 44 Wh | Acer Spin v SP513-51 6100U, Hard disk Graphics 520, 45 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bombardment Runtime | 39% | -13% | -48% | -14% | |
| Reader / Idle | 969 | 886 -9% | 749 -23% | ||
| H.264 | 456 | ||||
| WiFi v1.three | 505 | 702 39% | 486 -4% | 263 -48% | 463 -8% |
| Load | 147 | 109 -26% | 133 -x% |
Pros
+ swish design
+ flawless and loftier-quality end
+ decent input devices
+ fingerprint reader
+ firm 360-degree hinges
+ bright brandish with good viewing angles
+ versatile
+ ii USB Blazon-C ports
+ USB port with ability delivery
+ excellent battery life
+ decent system performance
+ very fast SSD
+ Lenovo Active Pen (optional)
Cons
- loud nether load
- sick-conceived microphone placement
- no SD-card reader
- mediocre multi-core performance
- not enough external ports
Lenovo'due south Yoga 720-13IKB is a solid and enduring versatile 13-inch convertible with low weight, small size, and 360-caste hinges. Information technology is based on Intel's current generation Cadre i5-7200U Kaby Lake, offers 8 GB of RAM, and it is adequately fast cheers to its high-functioning 256 GB SSD. Combined with an FHD display, the entire packet tin be purchased for as little equally $850.
The timeless minimalist "no-more than-than-necessary" design and choice of materials won us over. The Yoga 720-13IKB ticks almost all the correct boxes and clearly leans towards the well-tried proven and tested approach. This is unfortunate, considering nosotros would have preferred more but three ports.
All-in-all the Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB left a positive impression, albeit nosotros don't fully empathize the reasoning behind the omission of the SD-card reader. It'due south almost as if Lenovo is trying to imitate Apple tree'south minimalist "less is more" approach. Ultimately, the customer is going to make up one's mind whether or not the compromises are worth it. Our review unit offered solid and steady functioning, and we did non meet any serious issues whatsoever during the fourth dimension we've been using the laptop. The input devices were a pleasure to use, and all things considered the cost of $850 for a modern laptop is more than justified.
Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB - 2017-05-08 05/08/2017 v6(old)
Sebastian Bade
Convertible - Weighted Boilerplate
Pricecompare
Sebastian Bade, 2017-05-x (Update: 2019-04- 5)
Source: https://www.notebookcheck.net/Lenovo-Yoga-720-13IKB-7200U-FHD-Laptop-Review.219798.0.html
0 Response to "Lenovo Yoga 720 2-in-1 133 Touchscreen Laptop Review"
Post a Comment